A Muse in Drag...or Fur? (by Jenny Factor)
Has it ever bothered anyone else that the convention of the Muse is typically female? Is this purely a sexual preference (which could then be unhinged successfully by a writer's gender or by her romantic affiliation)?
Or are we all just hanging upside down on the Monkey Bars, waving to our Mommas?
One culprit may be the stereotype of the Woman as Good Listener. But whoever is clinging to that patootie must be forgetting many women: Gertrude Stein, for instance, who famously opined of writers that "it is necessary always to be talking and listening". Me? Woman though I be, I'm even less good at the listening. I have to sit on my hands at family dinners to remind myself to let my son get a word in edgewise, dammit.
Then there's the Beauty bit--that the female muse is desirable, her luminous fertile attention like a ray of sun, her limpid eyes worth courting.
Or is it the Grace of Muses that makes our language teacup-delicate, careful and deliberate?
Why couldn't a pet poodle be a muse, his head leaned in as if to ask yet another open-ended question....? Why not Cary Grant with that tender, wry attention? Or old Walt, smiling benignly and a bit scandalously over his damp beard? Have you ever written a poem that interlocutes with a different sort of listener....?
Yup, I'm sure I'm saying what you already know, but: The Muse Issue--at its root--has everything to do with (1) wanting to be heard (and at the same time not heard)--(2) with audience (and at the same time with privacy, with intimacy)--and (3) with how the desire to communicate (to someone--i.e., not to declaim) changes speech.
Cause How-can-it-be-worth-it-that-I'm-this-fabulous-if-nobodys-out-there?
-J.F.







